Dear all,
As we all know I have already published an article on the number seven pe_rizoma where he analyzed the saying 'who is silent consents'. Obviously
Eco has already written several articles proverbs. In particular, I read it on a Republic a few months ago. Ours, with a singular wit, listed hundreds of idioms and the like, and showed that for every motto of wisdom there is another that contradicts it in full. Bella strength. The article dwells in an untenable list of these sayings. You say, but it is Eco ! and then try to read the same, nothing to do, after a column and a half you could not really anymore.
We did something similar when he went to Fazio to make a good Marketta last book he edited, the story of ugliness' (de 'from the tree to the labyrinth' is the author, not the editor ). In that of the Umberto Fazio ' lists dozens of synonyms for 'bad', against the few available for the term 'beautiful'. MMM very interesting, at least as Pallos.
Not that I want nothing compared to what I write poorly in what the great narrator, but in this field, the popular motto, it is certainly more interesting analysis of the list.
Here is our theme: ' rice have increased in the mouth of fools '. I've always had a certain mistrust of this proverb. It means that the stupid laugh too? Sure, but this is too little to say. Why laugh so much? Rice is not a good thing? Because they associate it with the foolishness? Then I had an insight. The
perfect example of this motto is the image of a villain in anime (cartoons East). You know the bad when it is going to win and kill the good alternative to the procedure begins to laugh like an idiot and you leave to go to the verbiage? Or even the poor who do not yet know to be stronger (or weaker) but already laughing out loud? (Usually with a laugh of a fool).
Why the bad ride? The poor in general, if always believe too. E 'arrogant, believes that no one can be stronger than him, nobody can beat him. And then laughs. So the Bad is a narcissist, and it is arrogant. In addition to being arrogant and guilty of Ybris.
is the first point: the narcissist is bad, for this ride. And the rice is to darken the mind, to make stupid and unable to understand how they are to fuck, because we all know from the beginning that eventually fuck.
Evidence that rice is the cause of narcissistic folly, and not the other, the experiment can on your skin. The experiment requires that you be to play the villain. It 'requires a context with high opinions in the field, a lively debate, where the partners are exposed with all of their beliefs, a discussion that you never want to' lose '.
usually happens in such discussions, but even that is enough poniate a question, that the villain says something which is particulary proud (maybe it's the first thing he says). That this thing will look on her face a subtle smile, if bad is good at hiding it, the more conspicuous if it is just a peasant.
When that smile faces, remains in the mind of the bad only the contemplation of his alleged intelligence, its wit, in short of their own superiority. And 'this rice that clouds the mind and completely prevents the bad from the outside to observe their performance and realize the enormous Boiata he said, or simply to realize that his shot is not as affected, but has a big flaw like a camel.
At that point, however, any attempt at redemption is useless: any attempt to divert attention from its beauty will be resolved only nell'affondare more in themselves, in a system of Chinese boxes and references. Eventually the bad notices did not understand a strain of what he said / did the other for fucked, but it's too late, the villain is dead (the worst of deaths).
The only solution is that when you are in the odor of naricisismo is better to keep quiet or do not start out more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment